Institutional leaders
Deans, principals, heads of L&D, chief academic officers — people who set policy, allocate budget, and answer to a board. You need a defensible position, not a hype cycle.
New here? This guide helps you find exactly what you need based on your role, experience level, and goals.
ailearning.global is a working library and toolkit for people who have to make real decisions about AI in education — what to adopt, what to refuse, what to teach, what to redesign. It is not a vendor pitch and not a course you have to finish in order. The site is structured so you can drop in at the level of detail you need, take what you came for, and leave. If you keep returning, you will start to see the editorial backbone underneath: balanced perspectives, hands-on tools, and a refusal to pretend any of this is settled.
Deans, principals, heads of L&D, chief academic officers — people who set policy, allocate budget, and answer to a board. You need a defensible position, not a hype cycle.
If you are in the classroom or building the course, you need patterns you can use Monday morning. Quick wins, prompt libraries, and worked examples — without losing sight of the harder pedagogical questions.
You translate strategy into curriculum and coach colleagues through change. The Learn track, prompt-engineering material, and ethics simulator are built with your workflow in mind.
Parents, students, lifelong learners, people changing careers. You do not need an institutional title to take AI seriously. Start with First Steps and follow your curiosity from there.
Start at Learn → Intro and read in order through What to do and What not to do. Two short pages of context before you touch a tool will save you hours of confusion later. From there, go to Practice → First Steps and run through one concrete exercise. Do not try to read the whole site in one sitting — you will lose the thread.
If you only have fifteen minutes, the honest shortest path is: First Steps, then one prompt from the Prompt Library, then come back tomorrow.
Start with the AI Readiness assessment in Practice. It is not a sales funnel — it is a structured way to identify where your organization actually is on policy, infrastructure, and capability. Pair it with the Explore section, particularly Challenges and Opportunities, to ground your reading of the landscape.
From there, the Services pages describe the consulting engagements we run when an institution needs more than self-service material. Read them as documentation of how the work is structured, not as a brochure.
The Practice section is the working core of the site for you. The Prompt Library has categorized, copy-ready prompts; the Prompt Builder helps you shape your own. The Ethics Simulator runs you through realistic scenarios where there is no clean answer — useful for faculty workshops and for your own calibration.
When you find a pattern that works, take it to your colleagues. The site is meant to be raw material for your practice, not a destination.
Open the Resources section. The Tool Directory and Glossary are the fastest way to orient. The Insights hub holds longer editorial pieces with three persona perspectives on each topic — built so you can see where reasonable, informed people disagree, not just where they agree.
The FAQ exists for the questions people email about most often. If something obvious is missing from it, that is a gap we want to know about.
Brevait is a focused AI writing coach built for a specific use case — preparing for the French brevet exam in 3ème. It is its own thing, and it is fine to use it without engaging the rest of the site. The same applies to any single tool: come for what you need, leave when you are done.
This site is curated, not generated. The editorial position is straightforward: AI is a powerful augmentation of human work, including teaching and learning, and the people closest to that work should be the ones shaping how it gets used. That means treating educators as professionals with judgment, not as users to be optimized. It means refusing both the breathless adoption pitch and the reflexive refusal — neither helps the person standing in front of a class on Monday.
You will see three named AI personas across the site — Saya (research-driven), Marcus (equity-focused and cautious), and Zara (practitioner, energetic). They exist because every interesting question in this field has at least three defensible answers, and pretending otherwise produces bad policy. The personas disagree on purpose.
The site is multilingual by design. English, Spanish, and French are live now; more locales are planned. Translation is not an afterthought — it is part of how shared prosperity actually works in a field that is otherwise heavily Anglophone.
A well-organized site guide is essential for any educational resource. It helps visitors find the right starting point for their learning journey.
I appreciate that the site guide doesn't assume a linear path. Different educators have different needs and starting points.
If you're pressed for time, start with Quick Wins and First Steps. You can explore the deeper content later — but start doing something today.
This site is designed the way I design everything: multiple entry points, no forced paths, and respect for the fact that every visitor brings a different context and a different need.
Comprehensive AI training designed for educators, by educators. From awareness to mastery.